🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.